LAMMPS WWW Site - LAMMPS Documentation - LAMMPS Mailing List Archives
Re: [lammps-users] TIP4P long range solver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lammps-users] TIP4P long range solver

From: Ali Morshedi <morshedi1370@...24...>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 13:14:58 -0800

Dear axel,

Thanks for the response. One more thing:

Does that mean that currently it's not possible to use ewald summation with TIP4P because we don't have "ewald/tip4p" option?


On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Axel Kohlmeyer <akohlmey@...24...> wrote:

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Ali Morshedi <morshedi1370@...24...> wrote:
Dear lammps-users,

I use TIP4P model of water in my system. For pair style, I'm setting the following;

pair_style hybrid buck/coul/long 8.5 lj/cut/tip4p/long 3 4 2 4 0.1546 8.5

In the doc page for lj/cut/tip4p/long it is written: "style lj/cut/tip4p/long is for use with a long-range Coulombic solver (Ewald or PPPM)."
Is it correct to infer that if I'm using lj/cut/tip4p/long, then "kspace_style ewald 1e-6" will take into account the charge distance from O site in TIP4P?

​that is not correct.​

If so, then why is there a special "pppm/tip4p" to account for long range forces?

​it is there because you must have a modified long-range solver to account to the charge at a different location than the oxygen location without explicitly defining its position.



I'm using 11Aug17 version of lammps.

Thank you and best regards,


Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites,!
lammps-users mailing list

Dr. Axel Kohlmeyer  akohlmey@...24...
College of Science & Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia PA, USA
International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste. Italy.