LAMMPS WWW Site - LAMMPS Documentation - LAMMPS Mailing List Archives
Re: [lammps-users] Question on tersoff parameters
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lammps-users] Question on tersoff parameters


From: Ray Shan <rshan@...1795...>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 22:31:24 +0000

You have to find a paper that provides parameters for the Si-N system and cannot just glue two sets of parameters into one.

 

Ray

 

From: "Khourshaei Shar, Ali" <akhoursh@...6666...>
Date: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 3:26 PM
To: Ray Shan <rshan@...1795...>
Cc: "lammps-users@lists.sourceforge.net" <lammps-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [lammps-users] Question on tersoff parameters

 


From: Ray Shan <rshan@...1795...>
Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 6:22:07 PM
To: Khourshaei Shar, Ali
Cc: lammps-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [lammps-users] Question on tersoff parameters

 

By asking this question I am sure you have not read the paper by Cagin et. al…   Please do so and you shall find the answer.

 

Ray

 

From: "Khourshaei Shar, Ali" <akhoursh@...6666...>
Date: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 2:43 PM
To: Ray Shan <rshan@...1795...>
Cc: "lammps-users@lists.sourceforge.net" <lammps-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [lammps-users] Question on tersoff parameters

 

Hi Ray,

 

Thank you for the response. Just for the sake of clarity, if you check BNC.tersoff for ( C B B ) which I attached here, lambda2 of it should be the mean of ( B B B ) and ( C C C ) according to my understanding. For ( B B B ) it is 2.0774982, and for ( C C C ) it is 2.2119 and Surprisingly for ( C B B )  it has been entered as 2.2054 which doesn't follow that mean rule. Am I wrong, or there is an explanation ? I really appreciate your help.

 

Regards,

Ali


From: Ray Shan <rshan@...1795...>
Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 5:14:32 PM
To: Khourshaei Shar, Ali
Cc: lammps-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [lammps-users] Question on tersoff parameters

 

This doesn’t matter.  In Tersoff potential files a trio (A B C) means the bonding of B—A—C, which in many cases (e.g., Si Si C) have BA or AC bond lengths beyond the cutoff for the compound it parameterized for (SiC in this case).  Therefore it doesn’t matter if parameters like A, B, lambda, etc are zeros or not, since Si-Si-C bonds do not exist. For your own potential file you need to determine if such bonds exist or not, but just make them non-zeros to be on the safe side.

 

Ray

 

From: "Khourshaei Shar, Ali" <akhoursh@...6666...>
Date: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 at 1:54 PM
To: "lammps-users@lists.sourceforge.net" <lammps-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [lammps-users] Question on tersoff parameters

 

Dear LAMMPS users,

 

I have a very serious problem on building a correct data file for Tersoff potential. Suppose that I want to build it for a system of two type atom, i.e. A and B. It is obvious that data for ( A A A ) and ( B B B ) rows are available in paper. But, how about other 6 rows of data ? I mean ( A A B ) , ... (B B A ). I tried to understand the logic behind it. But, for example in SiC so many parameters are equal with 0. However, when I go through BNC m and check for example ( B B C ), zeros terms are not in agreement with ( Si Si C ) for example. Any comment please ?

Thanks,

Ali