|From:||"Parmar, Vinod" <vparmar@...132...>|
|Date:||Mon, 4 Dec 2017 20:57:00 +0000|
Thanks a lot for your valuable response. Experimentally It should not change by a significant number. When I tried to use "AtC source" instead of "AtC fix_flux" to deposit the input energy/fluence by femtosecond laser pulses, It did not have any effect on electron temperature (max). With "AtC source" command, electron temperature remained almost same if we increase the computational domain along x- and y-axis (when heat is influx along z-axis).
That's why I was feeling, either there is some problem with "AtC fix_flux" command or the computed flux value what I have mentioned in the command (fix_modify AtC fix_flux electron temperature fcst 388860).
Does this computed flux value (388860) should increase as I increase the computational domain??
Kindly reply about this problem.
Thanking you in anticipation
Fulbright Doctoral Research Fellow
School of Mechanical Engineering
585 Purdue Mall, Purdue University
West Lafayette, IN 47907
From: Steve Plimpton <sjplimp@...24...>
Sent: Monday, December 4, 2017 10:03 AM
To: Parmar, Vinod
Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org; rjones@...3...; jeremy.templeton@...3...; sjplimp@...3...
Subject: Re: [lammps-users] Reg. AtC Fix_flux and computational domain problem
I suggest you do the expt. Increase the flux bythe same ratio you are increasing the system size.
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Parmar, Vinod <vparmar@...5511....> wrote: