|From:||Axel Kohlmeyer <akohlmey@...24...>|
|Date:||Sun, 5 Nov 2017 07:12:15 -0500|
Dear Mr.KohlmeyerHello againDoes the compute group/group command calculate the "energy transferred" you said exactly?
ThanksOn Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 5:39 PM, Axel Kohlmeyer <akohlmey@...24...> wrote:those numbers are useless and irrelevant for the properties you want
you have to determine the amount of energy *transferred* and in the
case of the moving wall, that requires properly dealing with the
it looks as if you first need to have a deep peek into a text book on
statistical thermodynamics and gain a better understanding what you
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:54 AM, saeed alborzi <alborzi.saeed6@...24...> wrote:
> Dear Professor Kohlmeyer
> As you said , I compared the energy and velocity order of magnitude of the
> wall with and without oscillation. With a 2 angstrom amplitude and 2 fs
> period and no thermostatting, the maximum wall velocity is about 600 m/s and
> kinetic energy is about 23000 kcal/mol . With a 300K nvt thermostat and no
> oscillation, maximum velocity of 700 m/s and kinetic energy of 7000 kcal/mol
> is obtained. I think the values are not neglectable in camparison to each
> other. therefore I think I need to consider both fixes
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 3:27 PM, saeed alborzi <alborzi.saeed6@...24...>
>> let me refer to an article titled "Static and dynamic behavior of water
>> droplet on solid surfaces with pillar-type nanostructures from molecular
>> dynamics simulation"
>> at : http://www.sciencedirect.com/s
>> this is similar to my case except that I want to add heat transfer to the
>> I was thinking that if it was possible to add some amount to the surface
>> atoms' velocity as oscillating velocity while it is not rescaled by fix nvt
>> , it would be easy to implement. but the only problem is that the "velocity
>> set v_vx v_vy v_vz sum yes" command does not take a time-dependent value.
>> I apologize if I could not explain my meaning clearly and strongly
>> appreciate your help.
>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Axel Kohlmeyer <akohlmey@...24...> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:31 AM, saeed alborzi <alborzi.saeed6@...24...>
>>> > it was just an example, not the real case.
>>> > the effect of frequency value will be investigated
>>> if the frequency is (much?) lower, then - as i have already pointed
>>> out - there is no need to do both at the same time, as the time scales
>>> are sufficiently decoupled.
>>> what you are asking is a technically complex and difficult process to
>>> implement correctly.
>>> i am not going to spend any more time and effort on this until i am
>>> convinced that the outcome is physically meaningful.
>>> >> with a 500GHz motion?? how is that possible?
>>> Dr. Axel Kohlmeyer akohlmey@...24... http://goo.gl/1wk0
>>> College of Science & Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia PA, USA
>>> International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste. Italy.
Dr. Axel Kohlmeyer akohlmey@...24... http://goo.gl/1wk0
College of Science & Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia PA, USA
International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste. Italy.