LAMMPS WWW Site - LAMMPS Documentation - LAMMPS Mailing List Archives
[lammps-users] Distance between particles does not match for deformed box

# [lammps-users] Distance between particles does not match for deformed box

 From: habib rahbari Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 11:58:44 +0900

Dear Lammps developers,

I am simulating a 2D system of particles with granular hooke contact force:

pair_style      gran/hooke \${knAbs} 0 \${gammanAbs} 0 0 0
pair_coeff    * *

fix    integr all nve/sphere
fix     stick_id all enforce2d

To apply shearing, I deform the box with a shear rate shearRate:

fix boxDeform all deform 1 xy erate \${shearRate} remap v

Then I dump particles that have overlap:

compute 1 all property/local patom1 patom2 cutoff radius

and I dump distance and force between  them:

compute    2 all pair/local     dist   force  fx fy fz cutoff radius

I also dump position of all particles

dump  dmp3 all custom \${dumpSteps} dump.all.* id radius mass x y z vx vy vz omegax omegay omegaz

After all, I get positions of contacting particles from the dump
files (x1, y1) and (x2, y2), then I calculate the distance between them. I  consider
periodic distance between them if they have an over-boundary
contacts (this is simply done by adding/subtracting the box
length):

dx = x1 - x2

dy = y1 - y2

## for over-boundary contacts ##

dx = periodic(dx)

dy = periodic(dy)

and the calculate the distance

dist = sqrt( dx * dx + dy * dy )

Then I compare this distance with the one which is provided by
Lammps in the dump file.

I am surprised that they are very different!

The difference starts from 10% up to 100%. The latter for
contacts that are over boundaries.

I have cross-checked my calculations more than a week!

Apparently for the deformed box the distance is calculated via a
different formula, maybe something like

dx = x1 - x2 -/+ shearRate * (some time scale) * (box length)

Would you mind please let me know how the distance in deformed
box is calculated.

Can you refer me to to that line in the code so I can see it exactly.