LAMMPS WWW Site - LAMMPS Documentation - LAMMPS Mailing List Archives
Re: [lammps-users] CNT simulation
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lammps-users] CNT simulation


From: Steve Plimpton <sjplimp@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 08:15:24 -0600

If you are using fix deform remap x, then all the atoms in
the box dilate uniformly as the box stretches.

Steve

On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Mehrdad Arjmand <mehrdad.nano@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. If I want to know the exact deformation and
> deformation rate of one end atoms, Which one is more accurate?
> What is the difference between them?
>
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Steve Plimpton <sjplimp@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> If the remap option on fix deform is set to x (the defuault), then
>> the atoms deform with the box.  The velocity command just sets
>> the velocity of some atoms.  If you did this to the end atoms,
>> it could be similar to fix deform, but not exactly the same.
>>
>> Steve
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Mehrdad Arjmand <mehrdad.nano@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Dear friends,
>> >
>> > I have modeled a CNT and want to put it under tension. I want to ask
>> > you:
>> > Firstly, whether "fix deform" command that changes the box size with a
>> > constant strain rate (e.g. 0.1), changes the nanotube's length with the
>> > same
>> > rate or not.
>> > Secondely, I want to ask you if "velocity" does the same job as "fix
>> > deform".
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Mehrdad
>> >
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > lammps-users mailing list
>> > lammps-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lammps-users
>> >
>> >
>
>