LAMMPS WWW Site

LAMMPS mailing list

A mailing list for LAMMPS is available on the LAMMPS project page at SourceForge.

Anyone can post messages to the list or browse/search previous questions/answers in the archives. If you subscribe to the list you can get emails when people post to the list and can reply with a response.

LAMMPS developers try to respond to posted questions in a timely manner, but no guarantees. If you want to subscribe and answer questions yourself, that would be great!

Ways to use the LAMMPS mailing list

Top 10 guidelines for posting questions to the LAMMPS mailing list

These ideas will help you diagnose some LAMMPS problems yourself. And they will make it easier for people who read your message to help figure out your problem.

  1. Search the mailing list archives. You can browse old messages from this page. and search the archives from the this page. Your question may have come up previously.
  2. Put some descriptive text in the subject line. This helps people who search the mail archives.
  3. State what version of LAMMPS you are using, which is a date. If you downloaded a major release (the 2nd entry on the download page), which occurs every few months, then state the date of the release. If you downloaded the "upgrade" tarball (the 1st entry on the download page), note that it is continually updated with bug fixes and new features, as decribed on this page. When you unpack the lammps-upgrade.tar.gz tarball it creates a directory such as lammps-12Feb09, which tells you the version you have is current up to and including 12Feb09 patch listed on this page. State this date.

    This helps us, because we often remember when a similar problem came up, and can tell if you are encoutering a bug that has already been fixed.

    Note that if you are using a version older than the last major release and your problem is something that many users would run into, like a bug with input or output, then we may tell you to upgrade to the current (fully patched) version to see if your problem goes away.

  4. If a LAMMPS command is not working as documented in the LAMMPS documentation pages on the WWW site, and you are using a non-current version of LAMMPS, then recognize that the doc pages on the WWW site always reflect the most-current, fully-patched version of LAMMPS. If you want to read doc pages consistent with the version you have, then browse the HTML files in the doc directory of your distribution.
  5. If you have a problem building LAMMPS or it doesn't recognize a command that is part of a package, then read this section of the manual carefully, including the section on packages. If you don't understand the instructions there because you are inexperienced with building codes with Linux using Makefiles, then you should find a local expert or sys admin who can help you get LAMMPS setup on your machine. This is because many build problems are hard to diagnose remotely. If you think there is a problem with LAMMPS itself (e.g. the compiler complains about a LAMMMPS source file), or you think others might have a Makefile for your target platform, then post a question.
  6. If you don't know what line in your input script is causing LAMMPS to generate an error, then use the -echo screen command-line option when you run LAMMPS.
  7. If you are having a problem with a specific input script command, carefully read the entire doc page associated with that command. There may be text somewhere on that page which answers your question.
  8. It's always a good idea to visualize your sytem, especially if it runs for a while before something goes wrong. Check that the initial configuration of atoms is what you intended, then that atoms move as you expect them to.

    If things go bad on a particular timestep, then print out lots of thermodynamics and dump lots of snapshots before that timestep. Things may be going bad earlier than you expect. This can usually be done easily by running near to the problem timestep, changing output settings, then running past the problem timestep. For big problems, you can write out a restart file before things go bad, then run from the restart file with more output enabled.

  9. Recognize that you are sending your question to hundreds of people who subscribe to the LAMMPS mail list. Thus if your question is about a problem you are having with LAMMPS, it should be as simple and focused as possible. If you think there is a bug in LAMMPS, then describe exactly what occurred and why you expected the result to be diffferent.

    "Simple" means that posts like the following are not good:

    I ran a million-atom problem for 10 hours on 100 processors with the attached 1000 line input script and something bad happened. Help!

    Please make an effort before you post, to isolate your problem and reproduce it with as small a physical problem (number of atoms, number of timesteps) and as short and simple an input script as possible. Does the problem occur on one processor or only in parallel?

    If you need to attach a data file for us to reproduce the problem, make it small. If it has to be big, then don't attach it to your email. Instead, tell us that you have it, and we'll ask you to email it to us directly if needed.

    The most important thing you can do for us, is to isolate your problem to one (or a few interacting) commands which cause the problem. Since you know your physical model and what you are trying to simulate, you can often figure this out more quickly than us, by trying variants of your input script that turn on/off various options.

  10. General questions are welcome such as:

    We will always answer the first kind of question. We may not answer the other kinds if we don't have any suggestions for you. Note that the last kind of question can be hard to answer and may not have anything to do with LAMMPS, but more to do with the potential, or what you are trying to measure, or how you are using molecular dynamics to perform your simulation.

    Finally, if in doubt, just post your question. You won't be the first to have posted a strange message or a question with an obvious answer.